FOR MEN WHO HAVE BEEN, OR ARE BEING, OR WHO MIGHT IN THE FUTURE
BE F*CKED OVER BY MASONS, ZIONISTS OR THE REST OF THE ILLUMINATI
NEW WORLD ORDER MAFIA WHO ABUSE GOOD MEN FOR PROFIT. MUCH OF IT
AIDED BY THE PRESS BARONS IN THE ZIONIST BACKED COMPLIANT MEDIA.
DANGER ZONES FOR MENS HEALTH AND WEALTH
1. Having large sums of money in ANY bank. (They are all con men see
WE TURN THE HOMELESS INTO MILLIONAIRES FOR THE DAY
The X Factor vision of society blames the poor for their predicament
Campers descend on central Paris to highlight plight of homeless
2. Having any kind of mortgage with a bank. (They are all scams see
3. Marrying and signing a state marriage certificate. (Notice NO small print see
4. Having a child. (Maybe the single most dangerous threat to a mans welfare see
5. Entering ANY court especially NO JURY civil courts.(Mason judges make it up see
6. Hiring a lawyer anywhere across the globe. (ALL part of the Bar associations see
7. Trusting any politician.(They are ALL on the take see
9. Taking out any type of credit especially for a large purchase like a car (see
9. Trusting any journalist who answers to the corporate media (see
10. Trusting any cop who answers to masonic superiors (see
11. Allow social workers, lawyers and judges with a homosexual
agenda to decide
on the future welfare of your children (see HERE)
12. Doing any form of business with a FREEMASON. ( ALL of the above included see
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM AND US
THE MOST IMPORTANT PEOPLE ON THIS PLANET ARE THE LEAST IMPORTANT PEOPLE
OR AT LEAST HOW THE PRESS BARONS AND THEIR SCUMBAG JOURNALISTS PORTRAY THEM
We all strive to better ourselves, in our lives and in our children's lives, but
that should NOT be at the expense of others. The ruling mafia have created an underclass
for a number of reasons and would include letting us all know that if we do not
follow their rules we may end up on the streets. Also their mass media propaganda
machine ensures the poor, disabled, vulnerable and sick can be used as a punch bag and
blamed for ALL the ills of the world and have us believe it is the POOR that are
stopping us from bettering ourselves.
This is maybe the most devious lie created by the press barons who
have ensured the sheeple's venom is vented towards those least able to defend
themselves while distracting attention away from the ruling mafia
who live opulent lifestyles and with riches so VAST no one can truly comprehend
how vast that wealth is.
Fortunately the internet is rewriting history and exposing the myths from
a global propaganda machine that is breaking the despicable cycle of deceit and
where a psychological battle has been waged on our minds to ensure we
remain compliant with the ruling elite's demands. We must all re-learn
to respect those who need our sympathy and understanding, not venom, and we
must also be aware that every man facing injustice will allow, in the end, all
men to face that same injustice .
Without fighting for the weakest in our society, while complying with the
ruling mafia's orders, we condone and perpetuate a well orchestrated master plan
that will allow these evil bastards to hold on to power unless our humanity has
a massive wake up call and remove that ruling elite from power
in one way or another. It is only in the interests of the ultra wealthy that this system
can carry on ad infinitum. Everyone else will continue to suffer, as they have
done throughout history, while the ruling mafia carry on their deceitful and
diabolical plans and all part of their new technological world order.
IF YOU THINK YOUR LIFE IS BAD OR MISERABLE IT IS BECAUSE OF THE RICH NOT THE POOR.
The best index to a person's character is how they treat people who can't do them
any good, and how they treat people who can't fight back.
WE PROMOTE PEOPLE THE CORPORATE MEDIA IGNORE AT THEIR PERIL.
WRITTEN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HAVE NOTS AS OPPOSED TO THE MASS MEDIA
RUN BY ULTRA-RICH PRESS BARONS LOOKING DOWN AT THE PEASANTS
|COLD RUTHLESS DEVIOUS BASTARDS CONTROL THE EARTH
ONLY FOR THOSE AS YET TO WAKEN UP.
WARNING PSYCHOPATHS IN CHARGE
Super Rich The Greed Game (VIDEO)
Credit crunch? 619,000 millionaires living in Britain rising 17 per cent over the last two years
A third of Britain STILL belongs to the aristocracy
THE CABINET RICH LIST
Pay gap between highest and lowest earners growing faster in Britain than any of the world's richest countries
Do you think the cops are there to protect you from criminals?
Do you think judges are there to give you justice?
Do you think lawyers are there to protect your freedoms?
Do you think legal aid is paid to poor litigants?
Do you think bailiff's act honestly when evicting homeowners?
Do you think social workers are there to protect your children?
Do you think politicians are there to ensure your welfare?
Do you think local authority chiefs are there to provide you with services?
Do you think psychiatrists are there to guard your mental health?
Do you think the banks are there to make YOU prosperous?
Do you think the media are there to enlighten us?
Do you think teachers are there to educate ?
Do you think the armed forces are there to protect your security?
Do you think regulators are there to ensure all of the above stay in line?
If you have been reading and watching the complicit media for most of your life you likely have been brainwashed into believing all of the above, when in fact many are criminals or forced to act in a criminal way for their masters. They only get away with murder to protect the self appointed elite pulling the strings of their satanically controlled duped goons who act ONLY in the interests of the psychopathic madmen and women running the world while living in VAST OPULENCE.
You might also believe that the latest credit crunch is affecting everybody, but look closely at the facts and you will see there is a tier of privileged individuals who NEVER suffer during controlled recessions. In fact they PROSPER while millions struggle to survive the sudden changes of fortune brought about by the few at the top deciding to rein in the pittance they provide in sustenance to the masses primarily to stop any major dissent from their form of enslavement and tyranny . For centuries these few dynastic families have been getting away with absolute murder turning generation upon generation of our forefathers into slaves for the ultra wealthy. Unless we stop them now our children and grandchildren will suffer the same deviant world they claim is some kind of civilized society. They have required a massive propaganda network to get away with this for so long, but by the day that machine is grinding to a halt in the mass exposure of the monstrous evil they have been getting away with.
Do not be fooled by the fancy clothes and ancient traditions, these mobsters have been using subtle and devious tricks of the trade , disguised as some sort of esoteric knowledge, or so they claim, while using thuggery, blackmail, bullying and abuse to persecute anyone who steps outside their masonic bubble. These maniacs and psychopaths have been raping and murdering in endless wars they create to keep us all in fear and in our lowly place.
THEY ONLY HAVE THAT POWER AS LONG AS WE LET 'EM.
|COMMENTS FROM OUR READERS THAT ARE GREATLY APPRECIATED
Your passionate way with words is a daily source of energy to me and, I would expect, lots of others subscribers---keep it up!!...john
There are hundreds of websites, probably thousands, devoted to men’s issues and combating
feminism. Something for everyone. We are glad the topic is under discussion from every angle.
But if you really want to understand the New World Order conspiracy, one site stands
above the rest because it has the correct New World Order worldview (or close to it):
International Men’s Organisation.
From a review by the
NWO University Forum
Brilliant website matey I read it often and it blows my mind how much information
you have gathered over the years well done dude. Sullers
RELIABLE TRUTH SITES
partisan 17 June 2012
These are some sites that I find informative and balanced and more so,
those sites somehow inspire and move one towards the light of Truth.
I have been reading stuff on your website for some time and can relate to everything
that is being exposed. Glad there is a website out there which is really showing up
and exposing it all. Kind regards DR
Hi! Great site! Telling it like it is. Keep it up!
Love the site, you have a done an awesome job
I am an avid reader of International Mens Organisation. JB
We love intmensorg.info!
I really appreciate your collection of resources on the intmensorg.info website.
Thank you for your wonderful resources.
I just checked your website and I am blown away!! Its so cool to be in contact with you!!
I have been reading your site for some time now and gaining a deep insight into the
workings of this so called democratic western world we live in. I would like to show
my appreciation and gratitude. Thank you very much. Just as a good mate of mine
always says: Ignorance is the worst sin.
Therefore the revealing of knowledge and understanding must be the greatest virtue.
Thanks again Rory UK
Amazing info on the site keep up the fab work.
Dear Sirs ,
I just want to say how much I love your site. I've been an avid truth seeker
for many years and would be a big time follower of the Jeff Rense program, but I really
think your site is one of the best, well laid out and most interesting alternative media site.
I've only known of its existence over the last week, but I'm already hooked on it.
Keep up the fantastic articles and pressure on the NWO scum.
Name and email supplied
I just suddenly found your site on the internet, and WOW - it really is packed with useful
information about the inhuman beasts who are planning the NWO. Their activities are far
advanced in my country Sweden, but England is leading with regard to public camera watching.
Unfortunately your multimillion population seems to be as sleeping as our 9 million sheeple.
Good luck and keep holding up the torch of Knowledge!
Best regards , Name and email supplied from Sweden
PLEASE SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK ON ANYTHING TO
We try and ensure most of what is published is important and highly relevant to men
globally and especially those men made homeless and penniless by the evil misuse
of the law and courts that have a feminist / homopaedo / masonic /zionist / law society
We reproduce important articles under 'fair use' and in the 'public interest'
with due credit to our sources.
DUE TO MANY ATTACKS ON OUR WEBSITE WE REQUIRE THREE DOMAINS THAT CAN BE ACCESSED
LATEST NEWS UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY EVERY SECOND OF EVERY DAY
EXPOSING WHAT THE MASS MEDIA REFUSE TO EXPOSE (THANKS TO THEIR MEDIA LAWYER CENSORS)
BY REMAINING ON THIS SITE YOU ACCEPT WHATEVER COOKIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE WEBSITE TO FUNCTION
|IMO VIDEO CHANNELS STATS COMPARISON AT JAN 2016
|2015 TOP BILLIONAIRE GIT'S OF THE YEAR
|GLOBAL POPULATION UNDER ATTACK
|BREAKING NEWS (MOBILE VERSION HERE )
| Richard Gutjahr the German Photographer at Both Nice and Munich - Israeli Connections VIDEO
|McKinney questions Israel’s ties to recent attacks in France and Germany
Former US Democratic Representative Cynthia McKinney has questioned Israel’s ties to recent attacks in France and Germany, after an Israeli reporter managed to capture both attacks as they were happening.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
"Same Israeli photographer captures Nice and Munich tragedies," the six-term congresswoman from Georgia said in a tweet on Saturday.
The journalist in question is Richard Gutjahr, who videotaped the truck attack in Nice, France, that killed more than 80 people and injured dozens more on July 14.
Eight days later, the reporter happened to be on the site of another attack in Munich, Germany, where a shooting rampage claimed nine lives.
“How likely is that? Remember the Dancing Israelis?” McKinney asked, referring to reported Israeli celebrations during the September 11, 2011, attacks in the US.
The former American lawmaker also posted a video, showing an article with the headline: “Same Israeli photo-propagandist pre-positioned in Nice AND NOW MUNICH.”
"The fact that this guy happened to be at both, there's no way it's a coincidence," the narrator of the video said.
He went on to talk about Gutjahr's wife, a former Israeli Kensset member, before concluding that “it's 100 percent clear that Israel's fingerprints are all over these events.”
During the Nice attack, Gutjahr filmed the whole incident from a balcony at the Westminster Hotel, right next to the street where the French National Day celebrations were being held.
He also provided major Western media outlets with extensive reports about the Munich attack, posting images and videos on his Twitter account. Some of the tweets like the one showed above were deleted later on.
Munich police chief Hubertus Andrae identified the gunman as an 18-year-old German-Iranian man from Munich, who had no criminal record and whose motive was "completely unclear.”
|French officer claims interior ministry made her alter Nice attack report
A senior French police officer has claimed that the interior ministry “harassed” her into altering a security report from the deadly terrorist attack in Nice.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Sandra Bertin, the officer in charge of Nice's CCTV control room, told the Journal du Dimanche newspaper on Sunday that an unnamed interior ministry official contacted her after the attack and pressured her into altering her report for the night of the incident.
On July 14, a truck driver plowed through a Bastille Day crowd in Nice, killing 84 people and wounding 200 others.
Bertin claims that she was "harassed for an hour" by the official who wanted her to detail the presence of local and national police at the fireworks event where the carnage took place.
"The national police were perhaps there, but I couldn't see them on the video," she said, adding, "He ordered me to put in (the report) the specific positions of the national police which I had not seen on the screen."
She also said that the person from the ministry told her to email her report in a “modifiable form … so they didn’t have to type it all out again.”
France’s Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve has dismissed the claims and has announced that he will sue Bertin for defamation.
“It will be very useful if Madame Sandra Bertin could be questioned by the investigators and could give them the names and positions of the people she is accusing, the emails she is talking about and their contents,” he said in a statement.
“Unworthy accusations are part of the virulent polemic that certain elected representatives in Nice have wanted to encourage and feed every day since the terrible July 14 attack,” he added.
The 31-year-old Franco-Tunisian assailant in the attack, who was later shot dead by police, was identified as Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel.
The Daesh Takfiri terrorist group later claimed responsibility for the deadly attack in Nice. But, Paris prosecutor Francois Molins said that no direct evidence has been found to link the attacker to the terrorists.
The European country has been in a state of emergency since last November, when assailants struck at least six different venues in and around the capital Paris, leaving 130 people dead and over 350 others injured. Daesh claimed responsibility for the horrendous assaults.
On Wednesday, the French parliament extended the country's state of emergency for another six months.
|Lawyers protected BBC's predatory paedo Savile while alive and now they get to rifle his estate on death
One perfect example as to why these evil bastards are the biggest terror threat on the planet.
Many men pushed to suicide when stripped bare after divorce.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Every time a reporter tried to investigate Savile his lawyers were very prompt in threatening aggressive legal action
Lawyers 'get £2.5million of Jimmy Savile's estate leaving just £1million for the paedophile DJ's victims'
Lawyers will allegedly receive £2.5million of Jimmy Savile's estate, leaving just £1million for the victims of the paedophile DJ.
Law firm Osborne Clarke claimed costs of £1.8million for its work for NatWest bank and the running of the compensation scheme, while lawyers for the claimants will be paid £689,000, according to court papers.
A payout of just over one million has been agreed for the 78 cases of abuse made solely against the estate, meaning each victim gets an average of £13,000.
Child abuse survivors' representatives and a Labour MP criticised the legal fees, calling for judges to speak out against lawyer's charges.
NatWest bank applied to be allowed to make the payments to the claimants and their lawyers under the compensation scheme at the High Court in London on Thursday. They then applied to be relieved of their role of executor.
Mark Cunningham, QC, appearing for NatWest, told Mr Justice Warren that the estate was currently worth £2,042,000 - with £1,033,000 to be paid to claimants and £689,000 to their representatives.
Due to other costs, the amount left would be around £141,000 - which will be divided among defendants such as the BBC, the NHS and Barnardo's, which had already paid out damages.
It emerged after the Jimmy Savile's death that the paedophile broadcaster had assaulted hundreds of children.
Savile had an estate reported to be worth around £4million when he died in 2001 aged 84 without ever facing prosecution.
Savile sexually assaulted victims as young as five at NHS hospitals during decades of unrestricted access, reports say.
He abused 63 people, who were aged between eight to 40, connected to Stoke Mandeville Hospital from 1968 to 1992, according to the Stoke Mandeville report.
Claimants and their solicitors can expect their payments next week after a written judgement, though Justice Warren has said he will grant the application.
Peter Saunders, founder of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, told the Sunday Times: 'Arguably the only people who really win in these situations are the lawyers - they take the lion's share of the money in estates such as Savile's.'
John Mann, the Labour MP who has campaigned against child sex abuse, called the sum an 'absurdly large amount'.
Liz Dux, specialist abuse lawyer at Slater and Gordon who represented 168 of Savile's victims, said: 'What has been most important in all of this was that those Savile victims whose claims have been accepted, will receive their compensation in full. There will be no deductions.
'All parties including the Savile Estate wanted this matter concluded as quickly and cheaply as possible but the actions of the Savile Trust, who were the beneficiaries under his will, have been to constantly try to block the victims receiving a penny in compensation.
A payout of just over one million has been agreed for the 78 cases of abuse made solely against Saville's estate, meaning each victim gets an average of £13,000
Savile had an estate reported to be worth aroudn £4million when he died in 2001 aged 84 without ever facing prosecution
A payout of just over one million has been agreed for the 78 cases of abuse made solely against Saville's estate, meaning each victim gets an average of £13,000
'Sadly, it has been the actions of the beneficiaries of the Estate which has led to the escalation of costs due their continued opposition of the settlement scheme.
'Fortunately, the Courts have defeated their efforts. Justice has prevailed and those who Savile abused can now hopefully achieve closure.'
Osborne Clarke's costs for Thursday's two-hour High Court hearing were said to be £61,000, however a spokeswoman for the firm said the sum did no represent costs for the hearing.
They claimed the firm's fees 'comprised less than half the figure' and were not just for the two-hour hearing, but for the necessary work taken to make the application.
They added that under the scheme, 166 claimants will be receiving £2,306,636 - a figure covering claims against the estate, NHS, BBC, Barnardo's and mental health charity MIND - not those solely against the estate.
The law firm said: 'The £1.8million figure is inaccurate as taken out of context, and does not represent only Osborne Clarke fees, which are only a proportion of the overall figure.'
The overall sum included third-party costs.
|Britain's new FEMINIST PM bows to kiss the real controllers royal ass
|Fascist cops everywhere with Canadian style version VIDEO
|Scotland's feminist / lawyer leader meets England's feminist leader
Men in for a rough time while this pair are running the show
|Tory's new Cruella De Vil
| The brutal racist thugs masquerading as American cops VIDEO
|Get a job! Divorce courts curb meal ticket deals for ex-wives
We still don't believe this has been stopped
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Shift comes after landmark case ordered spouse to find work seven years after her split
Ex-wives who live off maintenance payments from their husbands are increasingly being ordered to get a job instead.
No longer can they live a life of leisure and rely on a monthly slice of their former spouse’s earnings, divorce
lawyers said yesterday.
Courts are far less willing to grant them the right to be supported for life – sounding the death knell of ‘meal ticket’ divorces.
Even if a mother in her fifties has not worked for decades, to raise a family, she will be expected to retrain and find work.
The shift follows a landmark case last year in which the ex-wife of a millionaire racehorse surgeon was told she should find work.
The Appeal Court backed Tracey Wright’s ex-husband Ian Wright after he complained it was unfair that he be expected to support her indefinitely, even after his retirement, while she made ‘no effort whatsoever to seek work’.
Now other courts are following suit, imposing time limits on maintenance orders rather than making them life-long.
Holly Tootill, a family lawyer with JMW Solicitors, which handles about 300 divorces a year, said the result of the Wright case had had a ‘marked impact’ on all such cases.
She said: ‘What we’re effectively seeing is the death of the so-called “meal ticket” which maintenance had long been regarded as.
‘Indefinite awards – or “joint-lives” orders – used to be something of a norm, a means of ensuring that the financially weaker spouse was provided for, especially until a couple’s children had grown up, when the arrangement might be revised.’
But she said since the ruling, in February last year, time-limited maintenance arrangements were becoming more common.
‘That is a perceptible shift. As a result, the current expectation in divorces heard across the country appears to be that wives should only receive support for such a period of time which, it is felt, allows them to retrain, if necessary, and find work rather than remain dependent on their ex-husband into the future.
‘I’m aware of numerous examples of women who have been forced to come to terms with the prospect of providing for themselves, including cases of women who had not worked for three decades in order to raise a family, being obliged to find a job in their fifties.’
‘Wives can, of course, challenge that view but few seem willing to do so.’
The case of Ian and Tracey Wright last year went all the way to the Court of Appeal after Mrs Wright challenged the ‘harsh words’ of a family court judge who said there was no good reason why she had done no work since her divorce.
When they divorced in 2008, the couple’s £1.3million seven-bedroom home, set in 16 acres of Suffolk countryside, was sold and the proceeds divided.
Mrs Wright, 52, was left with a £450,000 mortgage-free house near Newmarket, Suffolk, plus stabling for her horse and her daughters’ ponies. Her ex-husband, 60, was ordered to pay her £75,000 a year in maintenance and school fees, including £33,200 for her personal upkeep.
But Mr Wright, who runs an equine hospital in Newmarket, carrying out life-saving surgery on racehorses worth up to tens of millions of pounds, went to the High Court to seek a cut in his payments.
Judge Lynn Roberts agreed, saying Mrs Wright, a former legal secretary, should find a new job. ‘The world of work has innumerable possibilities … vast numbers of women with children just get on with it and Mrs Wright should have done as well,’ she ruled.
The case of Ian Wright last year went all the way to the Court of Appeal after his ex-wife Tracey challenged the ‘harsh words’ of a family court judge who said there was no good reason why she did not have a job
The case of Ian Wright last year went all the way to the Court of Appeal after his ex-wife Tracey challenged the ‘harsh words’ of a family court judge who said there was no good reason why she did not have a job
‘I do not think the children will suffer if Mrs Wright has to work … [it] may well provide them with a good role model. It is possible to find work that fits in with childcare … I reject her other reasons relating to responsibilities for animals, or trees or housekeeping.’ She added: ‘Mrs Wright has made no effort whatsoever to seek work or to update her skills…on the basis that she would be supported for life. It is essential that she starts to work now.’
The couple’s youngest daughter, then aged ten, lived with her mother, while the other daughter, who was 16 at the time, was at boarding school.
The ex-wife challenged the decision to slash her future maintenance, but Lord Justice Pitchford, sitting at the Court of Appeal, rejected her claim.
He said divorcees with children over seven should work for a living.
But Mrs Wright claimed she had been ‘made to feel like a criminal … for putting my children first’.
Elizabeth Hicks, family law expert at Irwin Mitchell, said judges increasingly made it plain ‘spousal maintenance is no longer a meal ticket for life’.
Charlotte Posnansky, of law firm Charles Russell Speechlys, added: ‘The pendulum has swung heavily in favour of women when considering the financial implications upon divorce … [but it] seems to be swinging back again.’
|American cops now shoot first and ask questions later VIDEO
Florida authorities are investigating the police shooting of an unarmed black man as he lay on the ground with his hands in air.
Charles Kinsey had been trying to calm an autistic patient in his care, when he was shot in the leg on Monday.
Police say they were responding to a call that someone armed was threatening suicide.
|Turkey declares three-month state of emergency VIDEO
| USA goes after $1bn in assets from Malaysia's 1MDB VIDEO
| Tiny wall built around Trump's Hollywood star VIDEO
|"You Have To Be Able To Protect Yourself and Your Family! with The 2nd Amendment VIDEO
Not a GOOD example he uses seeing the MUCH bigger threat
is the rogue state not another attempt
to smear all the
big bad men out there and the poor wee women in fear
| Man flies off waterslide onto rocky cliff VIDEO
| See How Close The 9/11 Hijackers Were To Saudi Royal Family And Bush! VIDEO
|Erdogan describes night of Turkish coup attempt VIDEO
|False Allegations in Divorce and Custody Battles
The most important lesson for young men to learn is that psychotic bitches can destroy decent men's lives
and their traits may take many years to rear their ugly head. A lawyer on legal aid will soon tease those traits
out when the state is picking up the tab to fleece the unsuspecting men who do NOT realise this is a common
ploy used to destroy.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Royal parasites wade into the domestic violence propaganda
(That gives judges they handpick to fleece fathers with impunity)
UK divorce laws a joke after judges gave ALL man's money to his ex-wife and threatened him with jail
The Personality Types of False Accusers and the Falsely Accused
Too many men have become the targets of false allegations. False allegations of domestic violence. False allegations of sexual assault. And false allegations of sexual abuse.
False allegations are lies and people who make false allegations are liars. A false allegation of abuse isn’t just any lie; it’s one of the most contemptible lies that exists. Even one victim of such a despicable lie is one victim too many.
Oftentimes, when a man finds himself the target of false allegations, he initially becomes paralyzed by shock and disbelief that a woman he once loved or still loves could perpetrate such a horrible lie upon him. The nightmare of false allegations is always compounded whenever children are involved.
What precipitates these kinds of false allegations?
Domestic violence literature holds that ending an abusive relationship is often the most dangerous time for the target of abuse. The classic stereotype is that of the alcoholic Neanderthal who beats his wife to death as she attempts to walk out the door after years of abuse.
For men, ending a relationship with an abusive woman is also often the most dangerous time.
Just like his female counterpart, when a man makes the agonizing decision to divorce an abusive wife, it may end in violence. Stories abound in the news of women killing their ex-husbands and their own children during divorce and custody battles. But women have another weapon at their disposal, which is just as lethal as any firearm or poison.
That weapon is the false allegation.
Many men, despite having been subjected to years of abuse, come a cropper when their ex makes a false allegation. How could someone you once loved and who supposedly loved you tell such horrible lies?
The simplest answer is that women who perpetrate false allegations are malicious and disturbed. Men also make false allegations and those that do are equally malicious and disturbed, but let’s face it, there are clear tactical advantages for women who fabricate false allegations.
Over the last 25 years, as the domestic violence and divorce industries have grown, a perverse system has developed in response to female initiated allegations of abuse in which the accuser is rewarded.
How are women rewarded for making false allegations?
They get attention. The person they hate is punished. They receive social approval. We all hate abusers and pedophiles, right? Look at that courageous woman who’s fighting to protect her child! Female false accusers may also receive free legal representation, welfare payments, free counseling and other support services and support from family, friends and neighbors — in other words, even more attention (Wakefield & Underwager, 1990).
Furthermore, there are very little, if any consequences for women who make false allegations in family court (Green & Schetky, 1988). Ultimately, the false accuser has far more to gain than she has to lose. However, I’m hopeful that we’ll soon be seeing more stories like that of Daryl Guinyard, the man who sued his ex-wife in civil court for making false sexual abuse allegations and was awarded $852,000 in punitive damages.
What happens to men when they’re falsely accused?
Many men experience a very rude awakening when they enter the justice system via false allegations. Perhaps the truth will prevail, but typically not without a considerable amount of collateral damage to themselves and their children.
When a man is accused of abusing a woman or child, any concept of due process and “innocent until proven guilty” flies out the window. Men are assumed guilty until proven innocent when a woman cries abuse or rape.
False allegations can turn a difficult divorce into full out nuclear war.
When a woman calls 911 and alleges violence, a man is often required to vacate the family home. If his wife follows up with an emergency protective order, he must then submit to prolonged alienation from his children. He becomes caught in both the criminal justice system and social service bureaucracies, which may result in jail time and/or court-ordered therapy while the real criminal, his lying wife, wins possession of both the children and the marital home.
Men who are falsely accused by their exes also face the threat of presumably well-intentioned, but zealous and biased mental health professionals and court evaluators who are quick to believe the accusations of the often highly emotional, female false accusers based on little to no evidence.
The falsely accused isn’t the only casualty of a court appointee’s or mental health evaluator’s rush to judgment. Both the accused and his children are hurt.
When the false allegations involve sexual abuse, children are subjected to a long process of interrogation, therapies and medical examinations, which can be invasive, confusing and traumatic. The falsely accused often suffers emotional and physical trauma, public humiliation, family breakdown and financial ruin. Furthermore, the relationship with his children may be irreparably damaged.
Fighting to prove his innocence can take years and become a financial expense many men simply can’t afford.
Just as false accusers rarely receive consequences for perverting and obstructing justice, court evaluators and mental health professionals who wrongly determine that abuse has occurred through their own incompetence and biases are rarely held accountable. The people who suffer the most negative consequences are the falsely accused and the children. This isn’t justice; it’s a mockery of justice.
What do we know about women who make false allegations?
Wakefield and Underwager (1990) determined that false accusers are much more likely to have a personality disorder such as histrionic, borderline, passive-aggressive, or paranoid. False accusers appear to be highly defensive and rigid, to have poor insight and a tendency to deny personal shortcomings. They tend to be extremely concerned about and sensitive to how others perceive them. False accusers tend to confuse feelings with facts. A woman may “feel” abused or may “feel” the children are being abused, when, objectively speaking, no abuse has actually occurred (Zepezauer, 1994).
Wakefield and Underwager (1990) found that:
[False accusers] are likely to misperceive the behavior of others and to react to stressful situations in maladaptive ways. Depending upon the specific personality disorder, they are characterized by instability of mood, impulsivity, inappropriate emotional overreactions, a need for approval and attention, and difficulties handling anger and conflict.
False accusers also have an obsessive hatred of and anger toward their ex-partner, so much so that their hatred and anger become a driving force in their lives. False accusers are individuals who hate their exes more than they love their children. Their hatred and anger trumps the needs and much ballyhooed best interests of their children.
What do we know about men who become the targets of false allegations of abuse?
They tend to be your average nice guy who has a more nurturing and passive personality. These men are unlikely to be socially aggressive or competitive and tend to lack insight into their personal relationships, which may explain why so many of these men are thrown for a loop when their ex throws them under the bus — even when she’s made threats throughout their marriage to call 911 and have him arrested (Wakefield & Underwager, 1990).
Additionally, these men, because of their sensitive and caring natures, may be more vulnerable to relationships with needy and manipulative women. Once in a relationship with a high-conflict (HCP) and/or abusive personality disordered woman (APDI), they may behave somewhat passively as they continue to naively hope that everything will magically work out in the end.
What are the identifiable characteristics of false allegation cases?
Ross and Blush (1987; 1990) have found certain patterns that characterize false allegation cases. For instance:
The allegations start after separation and legal action commences.
There’s a history of family dysfunction with high-conflict and other hidden underlying issues.
Again, the female accuser is often a histrionic or borderline personality.
The female accuser takes an angry, defensive and justifying stance.
The accused male parent is generally nurturing, passive and lacks “macho” characteristics.
In alleged sexual molestation cases, the child is typically a female under the age of 8.
The allegations surface via the custodial parent who is typically the mother.
The mother takes the child to an “expert” who corroborates the abuse and identifies the father as the culprit.
The court reacts to the expert information by terminating or limiting visitation.
Ross and Blush also determined there are primarily three types of false accusers: the histrionic, the justified vindicator and the borderline.
The histrionic personality appears anxious and presents herself as the victim of her ex. She describes herself as physically and/or psychologically abused by her ex and worries that the children are also in danger of being victimized from him. She projects or superimposes her feelings, fears and distortions onto the children. She seems to have “unusual and inappropriate” sexual concerns about the children and may regularly examine the children’s genitals and take them for frequent medical examinations.
The justified vindicator initially presents as assertive and organized with a justifiable argument supported by “facts, figures and opinions supporting her evidence.” She comes across as outraged and worried about her ex’s behavior. However, as most high-conflict types do, she becomes resistant, hostile and passive-aggressive or overtly aggressive upon cross-examination of her claims. She’s likely to try to discredit any evaluator or law enforcement official that questions her assertions and may threaten to sue or file an ethics complaint.
The borderline personality has intense and chaotic interpersonal relationships and is prone to intense valuation and devaluation. They will attempt to punish others who they believe have abandoned or hurt them. False allegations are a highly effective way of doing this.
In my practice, I coach many men through the divorce process. Prior to pulling the pin and telling their abusive wives that the marriage is over, I help my clients create a safe exit strategy. I use the phrase “pulling the pin” deliberately, because divorcing an abusive, high-conflict and possibly personality disordered woman is often very much like handling a live grenade.
I warn every single male client who is about to divorce or break-up with an abusive partner that he may be at risk for becoming the target of false allegations.
Many men can’t comprehend how or why their partner or ex could fabricate such a lie. Even when their wives have threatened to call 911 during the relationship to intimidate and control them, they still have a difficult time believing that it could happen to them. Men whose wives or girlfriends have threatened to call the cops during their relationship to intimidate or control them are especially at risk should they decide to separate.
Counseling is not a consequence.
False allegations, even if they’re later disproved, rarely result in a completely happy ending for the accused and the children. Family court and law officials must begin implementing serious consequences — beyond the anemic “consequence” of outpatient counseling — for both women and men who make false allegations. Perhaps if women who are inclined to make false allegations knew there would be real life consequences such as jail time, fines and loss of custody, they wouldn’t be as likely to see making false allegations as a viable option.
Enough is enough.
Counseling, Consulting and Coaching with Dr. Tara J. Palmatier, PsyD
Dr. Tara J. Palmatier, PsyD provides individual services to help individuals work through their relationship issues via telephone or Skype, particularly men and women who trying to break free of an abusive relationship, cope with the stress of an abusive relationship or heal from an abusive relationship. Her practice combines practical advice, support, reality testing and goal-oriented outcomes. Please visit the Services page for professional inquiries.
| UK's Secret Service protected MP homopaedo's so they can be blackmailed VIDEO
A short extract from the Michael Cockerell documentary 'Westminster's Secret Service' broadcast by the BBC in 1995.
Tim Fortescue was a Whip under Edward Heath between 1970 and 1973. In the documentary it was revealed that the Chief Whip kept a little black 'dirt book' which contained information about MPs, and this was used as a method of political control.
"Anyone with any sense who was in trouble would come to the Whips and tell them the truth, and say now, "I'm in a jam, can you help?" It might be debt, it might be a scandal involving small boys, or any kind of scandal which a member seemed likely to be mixed up in, they'd come and ask if we could help. And if we could, we did. We would do everything we can because we would store up brownie points. That sounds a pretty nasty reason but one of the reasons is, if we can get a chap out of trouble, he'll do as we ask forever more."
| Obama After Nice Attack: We Must Not Do Terrorists' Work (really????) VIDEO
Really???? Meanwhile back
in good old USA local black citizens are
being gunned down with impunity
| Congress releases '28 pages' on alleged Saudi ties to 9/11 hijackers VIDEO
| Gun control will stop killings? Erm how about trucks? VIDEO
| Turkey’s coup attempt fails VIDEO
| Attack in Nice: Lorry driver confirmed as Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel VIDEO
|Teen victim describes horror of Nice terrorist attack VIDEO
|Lorry Terror Drivers Identified VIDEO
|UK divorce laws a joke after judges gave ALL man's money to his ex-wife and threatened him with jail
THE BIGGEST TERROR THREAT TO MEN'S WELFARE COMES FROM FAMILY COURTS AND THE ROGUE CORRUPT FREEMASON JUDGES
WHO OPERATE THEM FOR THE EXCLUSIVE ENTITLEMENT OF WOMEN BUT PRIMARILY THE CROOKED LEGAL MAFIA MAKING BILLIONS
FROM THE SPOILS. YET WE DON'T HEAR ANY OUTCRY FROM THE POLITICAL MAFIA WHO ARE WATCHING MEN'S LIVES BEING DESTROYED
BY DRACONIAN JUDGEMENTS.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
A former millionaire software tycoon has branded Britain's divorce laws 'out of date' after winning a test case against a suspended jail sentence imposed against him for failing to keep up maintenance payments to his ex-wife.
Peter Morris, 51, said he has been left 'empty handed and homeless' since the end of his 25-year marriage to ex Jane after she was given the majority of the former couple's £560,000 wealth.
Mrs Morris, 52, was awarded £500,000 in the settlement while he received £66,000. He was later ordered to pay her £77,000 in maintenance and other 'debts' and was last year given a six-week suspended prison term for failing to pay her £2,000 per month.
But his lawyers told Court of Appeal judges jailing husbands for failing to pay maintenance violates their human rights and is a 'curious survivor' of Dickensian debtors laws which has 'no place in the modern world'.
Mr Morris is now asking for a financial 'clean break' from his ex, insisting he cannot pay her anything more as he is 'homeless, insolvent, and unable to meet his obligations.'
The couple enjoyed quarter of a century of well-heeled married life in their £1.2million four-bedroom detached house in the Chilterns.
Mrs Morris gave up her pre-marriage career as a businesswoman and 'stayed at home to look after the home and care for their children by agreement with her husband.'
He was MD of a software company with a seven-figure turnover, who earned up to £240,000-a-year, and the family enjoyed 'expensive holidays' as part of an enviable lifestyle.
Even when their marriage hit the rocks and they split in 2013, their 'extravagant' spending, particularly by Mr Morris, continued unabated.
By the time the case got to court, the money had almost dried up and Judge Glen Brasse ruled that only enough remained in the pot to meet the core needs of the wife and the couple's children.
Judge Judith Hughes QC later hit him with a suspended jail term for his failure to pay up.
Challenging the decision, Peter Duckworth, for Mr Morris, said a system which can see husbands jailed over debts to their ex-wives is a legal relic that ought to be consigned to history.
He told Lady Justice Black, Lord Justice Floyd and Mr Justice Moylan: 'The objective seems to be to force the husband into a situation from which he cannot escape...it is a very curious survivor of very old practices. Mr Morris's case raises an issue of public importance.
'Procedures are being implemented which don't comply with the obligations of the UK under the European Convention on Human Rights, consigning the husband to a prison sentence on a charge of which he was only dimly aware, at a time when he was not legally represented'.
Holding prison sentences over husband's heads was not 'in keeping with the modern view that husbands and wives approach this court on an equal footing,' added the barrister.
Following those arguments, Damien Garrido QC, for Mrs Morris, accepted that her ex-husband's suspended jail term should be overturned.
But she is hotly contesting his case that they should go their separate ways financially and that he shouldn't have to pay her any more.
Mr Morris, whose company has gone into administration, insists that his financial fortunes have continued to plummet and it is simply 'impossible' for him to pay all he owes.
And Mr Duckworth claimed that Mrs Morris is now better off in real terms than her ex-husband.
He told the court: 'There is nothing to suggest that the husband wilfully or deliberately neglected to pay maintenance.'
The barrister added: 'He was thrown out of his London flat and is living on the charity of his lady friend.
'He has been left in an impossible situation of being homeless, insolvent, and unable to meet his obligations'.
Of Mrs Morris, Mr Duckworth said: 'The indications that she can manage on the income that she has are many. She has a net income of over £23,000 a year.
'She is currently working for an estate agents as a receptionist. Her employment status is permanent. The wife moved into a mortgage-free property.
'There is also an entitlement from the estate of her late mother. This is a significant move in the wife's resources.
'The husband lacks the means to pay spousal maintenance, but the wife is secure in a new career, is backed by an inheritance and not in need of funds.
'In the current circumstances, he will be unable to go on paying anything to his former wife. Is this now a clean break case? I submit that it is.
'I believe it is time now to sever financial ties between this couple,' the barrister said.
Mr Garrido, in reply, urged the judges to uphold the maintenance order.
He complained that there was 'a complete absence of clarity' about Mr Morris's income, due to 'contradictory statements and complete lack of disclosure.'
The barrister went on to assert that Mr Morris is receiving substantially more money each month than he professes.
The judges have now reserved their decision on Mr Morris's appeal and will give their ruling at a later date.
Mr Duckworth said outside court: 'It is essentially a test case'.
Without a clean break, Mr Morris was anxious that his ex-wife could again seek to enforce the debt, putting him at risk of jail once more, he added.
| CERN MAKING EARTH A TIME MACHINE VIDEO
| Evil tory bastard Cameron OUT another tory feminist bastard IN VIDEO
|There is only one thing certain about government that it ain't there for our benefit
Global governments are NOT people's governments . Government is a means by which the rich and powerful control the peasantry to do their every bidding. If governments were for the people why is there so much inequality?
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Manufactured Conflict: The Banker's Hegelian Grip
A Coalition of Lying Thieving Bastards
Changing the relationship between government and the citizen
The fabricated democracies give the illusion the peasants have a choice when in reality the fixers ensure only their donkeys are running in the race. Government power under the guise of democracy is used to massively oppress the populations and anyone who has faced unemployment will know the lengths government will go to block the supposed basic welfare they claim protects the peasants from total and outright poverty.
In Britain those on welfare, either through redundancy or illness, face a big brother system that at every turn is looking for ways to stop that pittance and why homelessness has become a daily reality for anyone left at the bottom of the pile by draconian measures and the vile tory regime using those victims as the cause of all of Britain's woes.
The sinister extremes government is taking to bully, oppress and psychologically push the imposed useless eaters into an early grave is staggering with a population cajoled into believing this is best for society under a fascist regime.
Never has Britain seen such a sick and deviant mindset at the head of a pariah that claims to be helping ALL British citizens when so many are facing enormous oppression of their basic rights. The same measures used against divorcing fathers now being used against more and more sections of the population.
Only those facing such measures know the lengths the police state has been installed to disrupt and ultimately psychologically torture their victims into a very early grave.
Government ministers are in reality monsters despite them depicted as heroes and moral guardians in their controlled media.
Two contracts you will never get to read and fully understand are the marriage contract and the citizens contract. Something governments change by the minute to ruthlessly fleece the peasantry.
|"WE WANT AN END TO THE POLICE STATE!" Alicia Garza "Black Lives Matter" Founder VIDEO
| World's best but most dangerous homemade waterslide VIDEO
|'Weekend of rage' protests take place across America VIDEO
| British daredevil Max Cave leap between Hong Kong 25 storey skyscrapers VIDEO
|Healing Relationship Between The Police And The Public? VIDEO
| Bahamian Government WARNS Citizens Traveling To USA "Especially Young Men" beware of cops VIDEO
|The entitlement that has to STOP as Christina Estrada handed £53m by UK's masonic / zionist judicial crooks
Her list of entitlements would make any man physically sick. The scum and filth who pamper to
these golddigging demands are the enemy of any decent man who is being shafted by a totally corrupt
FULL ARTICLE HERE
MUCH MORE ON THE DIVORCE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX HERE
Ms Estrada was cross-examined in court on her needs, which she said included:
£40,000 a year for fur coats
£109,000 a year for haute couture dresses
£21,000 a year on shoes
£60m to afford a luxury London home
A £4.4m countryside home in Henley-on-Thames
£495,000 for five cars - three in London and two in the America
A former supermodel has been awarded a £53m ($69m) lump sum after a divorce battle with her billionaire ex-husband.
Berkshire-based Christina Estrada, 54, had wanted £196m from Saudi businessman Sheikh Walid Juffali, 61, to meet her "needs" - including £1m a year on clothes - the High Court was told.
The total settlement, which takes into account her own assets, is about £75m.
Her lawyers said this makes it "by more than £50m, the largest needs award ever made by an English court".
Ms Estrada, who is is currently living at the matrimonial home bordering Windsor Great Park, had rejected an offer that, when added to her own assets, would have given her £37m to live on.
The US citizen was married to Mr Juffali for 13 years and has been based in the UK since 1988.
She said: "Having grown up in a middle-class family and having enjoyed a successful career until my marriage, I am fully aware that the spectacular life Walid and I led was immensely fortunate and rarefied.
"And I fully understand how this can be perceived in the wider world.
"My focus now is to support my daughter and move forward with our lives."
She added that the process had been "bruising and distressing", explaining that her ex-husband had taken a second wife and divorced her without her knowledge, and had used diplomatic immunity to try to stop her accessing a legally binding settlement
The former Pirelli calendar model argued in the London court that she was 'ENTITLED' to a settlement that would allow her to maintain her lifestyle.
She told family judge Mrs Justice Roberts: "I was a top international model. I have lived this life. This is what I am accustomed to."
Her lawyers estimated her ex-husband is worth £8bn.
But Mr Juffali, who has been married three times, said in a written statement that was a "fantasy" figure, putting his current net worth at £113.8m.
He could not attend court because he is terminally ill with CANCER and undergoing treatment.
He said in the statement that he had left the vast majority of his wealth to his three eldest children, including his teenage daughter with Ms Estrada.
The sheikh divorced Ms Estrada in Saudi Arabia in 2014 under Islamic law, without her knowledge. He had married a 25-year-old Lebanese model in 2012 while still married to Ms Estrada.
Mr Juffali's solicitors Mishcon de Reya issued a statement after the hearing, stating that he had "shown himself to be a fair man who has been prepared to offer his ex-wife a more than comfortable lifestyle for the rest of her life, which he believes she deserves".
"The sole purpose of this case was to evaluate an appropriate financial settlement based on Ms Estrada's needs, as opposed to the extraordinary demands presented by her at the start of this case," they added.
Mrs Justice Roberts said in her ruling that Ms Estrada had described her lifestyle during the course of the marriage as "magical".
She added: "That may well be an apt description. The issue is the extent to which she should be entitled to continue with the bubble of a 'magical existence' for the foreseeable future. I am concerned with ensuring that adequate provision is made to meet her reasonable needs."
Mr Juffali has been ordered to pay Ms Estrada her lump sum by 29 July.
Though Ms Estrada's lawyers said she received the largest "needs award" ever made by an English court, larger total payouts have been made in the past.
In 2014, a court said Jamie Cooper-Hohn should receive £337m in her divorce from London financier Sir Chris Hohn.
Three years earlier, the late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky's former wife Galina Besharova reportedly agreed to accept between £165m and £220m as part of a settlement.
|Blair: "He was a one-man government" VIDEO
| 2 snipers shoot 11 officers, killing 4, during demonstrations in Dallas VIDEO
| Dallas: 11 cops shot 4 killed VIDEO
| Obama reacts to wave of police shootings VIDEO
|Beyoncé: 'Stop killing us' protest during her Scottish gig VIDEO
|Dallas Police Press Conference Suspect Says "THERE'S BOMBS ALL OVER THE PLACE!" VIDEO
| Outrage over two fatal shootings of black men by USA cops VIDEO
|Trey Gowdy GRILLS James Comey On Hillary Clinton Emails 7/7/16 VIDEO
| How Safe are Asia's Airlines? VIDEO
|Only scum need apply to become president
|Woman Live Streams Her Friend Dying After He's Shot By Cops (Pulled Over For Broken Taillight) VIDEO
|The future of British politics
|Divorcing men in a police state
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Ex-Wife fights for share of ex's £175,000 payout for child abuse: Estranged partner could make legal history after arguing money is a marital asset
(Divorce hitting new lows with this disgusting claim)
Ex-wife fights for chunk of abuse victim’s £175,000 payout
The Divorce Industrial Complex
Divorce Industrial Complex tries to tighten its grip to appease golddiggers(VIDEO)
Domestic abuse industry gives feminists / legal mafia the excuse to entitlement
KERCHING! Their husbands built up some of Britain's most famous retail names while they brought up the children. Now they're divorcing and pocketing millions. Fair - or just greedy?
Divorce Leads to Bankruptcy
Child Support Industrial complex(video)
Many argue over to what degree countries have a police state in operation? In the west, where the political and legal mafia have been pushing feminist and homosexual agenda's, there is one section of society that can clearly see the depths of a police state and that is divorcing men.
It is only when you are hounded, persecuted and attacked primarily for your estate and children , thanks to the utter corruption of the west's divorce industrial complex, that you see ALL the arms of the state being used to destroy your life from a well oiled bunch of stasi like vermin only to happy to instigate the court orders that ensure men can be rounded up like sheep and pushed around for decades by the thugs who are getting away with murder.
The political scum that seek the electors vote come election time are fully aware this system is in operation and not only condone the long term harassment of heterosexual men but , at every opportunity, add additional ploys to ensure the most lucrative terror threat on the planet for men is the divorce courts.
Despite regular reports of men being found at the bottom of cliffs or high buildings, on railway tracks or next to a large bottle of pills NONE of the evil bastards that are behind the mass culling of men take any notice but instead continue to ride roughshod over every right men require to STOP the state machine rolling over them like an enormous tidal wave.
Forget the utter bullshit of their manufactured threats pumped out by a complicit media. The west truly has a massive police state operating in every area of the countries behind this monster that is only truly visible to the men facing oppression that has come from decades of evil laws manufactured by zionist / freemasons who have become ultra wealthy thanks to the draconian powers imposed on heterosexual men. These same bastards immune to the very laws they themselves manufacture.
|Congressman Issa Says FBI Director Comey Is Lying About Hillary Clinton's Criminal Intent VIDEO
| Tom Crawford's message to the house thieves VIDEO
|Ex-Wife fights for share of ex's £175,000 payout for child abuse
Disgusting divorce claims have reached new depths
FULL ARTICLE HERE
Ex-wife fights for chunk of abuse victim’s £175,000 payout
An estranged wife is trying to claim part of the £175,000 compensation her husband received for suffering sexual abuse as a child.
As part of her divorce settlement, Helen Tippett, 41, has applied to the courts for a share of the cash paid to Andrew Kerslake.
Mr Kerslake, 45, regarded the compensation as ‘dirty money’ and put it into a trust to be given to charity when he dies.
But Miss Tippett claims the money is a marital asset and wants her share of it. It is believed legal history will be made if the courts find in her favour.
Mr Kerslake was molested between the ages of five and ten by a family friend. After he finally went to the police in 1998 his abuser was jailed for three years.
The father-of-four was paid £175,000 by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority – a government organisation which pays damages to victims of violent crime – in 2002.
He set up the Andrew Kerslake Trust and the fund has grown to almost £250,000 after being invested by his lawyers.
Mr Kerslake, who has waived his right to anonymity as a victim of sexual abuse, said: ‘I was given the money to compensate for what happened to me when I was a very young boy.
'I was abused over 500 times, every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday. It left me with both physical and emotional damage.
‘I didn’t apply for the money, I didn’t really want it at the time. But I’m not prepared to hand it over as part of our divorce settlement.
'It doesn’t seem right that my ex-wife should get a penny of it – it does not belong to her, she wasn’t the one who was abused.
‘It is shameless and immoral that she is even trying. I’m very disappointed in her.’
When the compensation was paid the couple were happily married. Miss Tippett was studying for a humanities degree and Mr Kerslake was a stay-at-home father.
He said: ‘My wife wanted to spend it, she wanted a beautiful house, she had all sorts of ways of spending it. But to me it was dirty money...I could not bring myself to use it.’
Devout Catholic Mr Kerslake wants the fund to be his legacy and has laid down instructions about how it should be used to help other victims of abuse.
His 19-year marriage came to an end four years ago and he has since become estranged from his children.
His wife reverted to her maiden name, and Mr Kerslake believes she is now in a relationship with a man named Jarrod Williams who is 11 years her junior.
Mr Kerslake, who walks with the aid of crutches after breaking his back in a fall, said: ‘They say they are not living together but he posts pictures of the two of them in bed on Facebook.
‘I’m concerned some of that money would end up in his pocket. That can’t be right.’
Mr Kerslake said he now suffers from a variety of health problems. His legal team say that if Miss Tippett wins the case it will be the first time compensation paid to a sex abuse victim has been part of a divorce settlement.
He said: ‘I don’t want people to think I put the money in a trust to stop Helen getting her hands on it – that is not the case.
‘I just don’t want the money myself and it is my wish it will be divided between two charities of my choice when I die.
‘It was paid to me for something that happened long before I met Helen. I still have to live with the consequences of that.’
Mr Kerslake lives alone in a housing association bungalow in Llanharan, near Bridgend in south Wales.
His estranged wife now works part-time in a church breakfast club and claims she needs the money to buy a house for herself and her two youngest children.
Miss Tippett was accompanied by Mr Williams at two preliminary hearings at the County Court in Pontypridd.
She refused to comment on her claim, which is due to be decided in September.
| “I toppled Saddam’s statue – now I want him back" VIDEO
| Hillary Clinton Interviewed by FBI in Email Probe VIDEO
|'State of Surveillance' with Edward Snowden and Shane Smith VIDEO
| Gigantic aurora lights up Jupiter’s North Pole VIDEO
|Phone Hackers: Britain's Secret Surveillance VIDEO
|Freemasons: Apemen posturing
No one can truly comprehend the pathological madness of any man wanting to join a secret society that has a long history of
some of the most vile abuses of their fellow men and the monstrous death and destruction across the globe.
FULL ARTICLE HERE
MP blames "militant feminists and politically correct males" (freemasons) for stirring up problems between men and women
One thing definitely is true is that they are ape men posturing using a massive propaganda campaign that suggests subtly and deviously that
THEY and not every other man that is not part of their satanic cult will protect women.
Domestic violence as portrayed in THEIR compliant media paints a sinister picture of men constantly battering women
and children and who deserve a state machine to bring a massive boot down on the face of men to protect those down
trodden women when the exact opposite is the case .
The state, run almost entirely through masonic infiltrators, requires to dominate non mason men and under the GUISE of protecting women they can destroy any competition that might eat into their vast plundering network that encircles the globe. This ensures men with the worst human traits get to eat out of the enormous trough that has accrued from the plundering of men through legal and political machinations and the brute force assured by the freemason thugs operating inside the police forces required to impose THEIR LAWS that they themselves are not required to adhere to.
There is no bigger terrorist threat on the planet than the zionist controlled freemason network and where sinister figures like the Queen's loyal lord lieutenant the Duke of Kent creates the orders for their dim witted masonic lackeys to do all the dirty work required to keep them as the top NAZI despots on the planet. A stasi like secret force that ensures only the royals and their global army of subservient ape men (through blackmail control) can ring fence the world's wealth at the enormous expense of men and their families who wont be selling their soul to the devil any time soon.
|EXPOSING THE NEW WORLD ORDER
EXPOSING CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS WHILE DEMANDING LEGAL,JUDICIAL AND POLITICAL REFORM TO ENSURE
PROPER ACCOUNTABLE DEMOCRACIES. A GROWING
RESISTANCE TO THE SATANIC CONTROL OF THE WORLD BY THE ILLUMINATI, SKULL AND BONES, MASONS, BILDERBERGS, SPECULATIVE SOCIETY,KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND ALL OTHER SECRET SOCIETIES ACTING
AS SHADOW GOVERNMENTS FOR WESTERN SO CALLED DEMOCRACIES.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER MOBSTERS WILL NOT GET AWAY
WITH THEIR PLANS TO ENSLAVE GOOD MEN WITH THEIR EVIL SATANIC NETWORK OF CONTROL,
A WORLDWIDE ZIONIST CABAL AND EVERY SINGLE PROMOTER OF ITS EVIL EMPIRE.
MASONIC RUN COMPANIES PROMOTING HIGH TECH STATE MONITORING SYSTEMS THEY ARE TRYING
TO FORCE ON ALL FREE MEN.
The majority of the mass media has a hidden agenda and none of it
includes fair reporting of men's issues.
Please send comments and articles to EDITORIAL.
World NEWS the government and judicial controlled mass media wont EXPOSE.
|LATEST GLOBAL NEWS UPDATE
ABOUT US JOIN
TERRORISM IS SOCIAL ENGINEERING ON A GLOBAL SCALE